L. Samsonova
To Win
Y. Starodubtseva
To Win
Liudmila Samsonova vs Nao Hibino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L L L W
Form
L W L L W L W W L LH2H: Samsonova 1 - 1 Hibino
They have played 4 sets in total, with Samsonova winning 2 and Hibino winning 2. The last match between Samsonova and Hibino was at the Volvo Car Open - Charleston, 06-04-2021, First, Clay with Liudmila Samsonova getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Liudmila Samsonova | 1 |
| Nao Hibino | 1 |
Volvo Car Open - Charleston(06-04-2021)
6
2
6
1
| Samsonova | Stats | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (10-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (11-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 20 | Ranking | 202 |
| 12 | Highest Rank | 56 |
| 26 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 12 |
| 61% (321-205) | Career Total W/L | 55% (392-326) |
| $4,893,703 | Career Prize Money | $1,497,842 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dimitrov VS Jarry PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Nao Hibino
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
53)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 18 | Games Won | 16 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:9:30 | Average Match Time | 1:9:30 |
| 47% (48/102) | 1st Serve % | 62% (69/111) |
| 69% (33/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (43/69) |
| 50% (27/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (19/42) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 44% (49/111) | Return Points Win % | 41% (42/102) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Liudmila Samsonova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Caroline Dolehide
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
8
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Daria Kasatkina
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Caty McNally
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
40 of
83)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
10
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Nao Hibino
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yasmine Mansouri
78%
(
81 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Nao Hibino
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
43
Total Points Won
46
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Nao Hibino
86%
(
56 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Nao Hibino
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Irem Kurt
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Nao Hibino
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (321/205) | Win/Loss | 55% (392/326) |
| 59% (709/499) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (872/773) |
| 53% (6016/5236) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7747/7271) |
| 60% (119/79) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (283/216) |
| 58% (124/88) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (49/60) |
| 68% (50/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (26/19) |
| 67% (28/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (34/31) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1930 | Aces Total | 986 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1655 | Total Double Faults | 1511 |
| 1:27:43 | Average Match Time | 1:11:45 |
| 348.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 193.42 |
| 56% (17682/31396) | 1st Serve % | 65% (24436/37437) |
| 68% (12092/17682) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (14816/24436) |
| 48% (6642/13714) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6037/12998) |
| 46% (1709/3752) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2171/4568) |
| 44% (14168/32405) | Return Points Win % | 45% (16861/37726) |
| 60% (34/23) | Slam W/L | 47% (35/40) |
| 54% (44/38) | Masters W/L | 44% (28/36) |
| 100% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 56% (9/7) |
| 60% (95/63) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (103/104) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (88/44) | Challenger W/L | 59% (193/134) |
| 61% (58/37) | Futures W/L | 83% (24/5) |
| 61% (318/521) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (385/706) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 53% (78/148) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (84/147) |
| 57% (90/159) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (121/213) |
| 86% (324/278) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (369/319) |
| 14% (324/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (369/48) |
| 21% (202/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (349/70) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
